الانتقال إلى المحتوى
The Lumenary
الصفوف 6–8Foundationsمُخطَّط له

Relations, equivalence relations and partitions

Relations as sets of ordered pairs, and the special relations (reflexive, symmetric and transitive) that sort a set into non-overlapping classes. 'Same remainder', 'same colour' and 'same shape' are first examples.

math.found.equivalence-relations

لم يُكتب درس هذا الموضوع بعد. المخطط أدناه جزء من خريطة المنهج ولم تجرِ مراجعته.

يعتمد على

عدد المتطلبات السابقة الإلزامية (حتى الأساس): 2

ستتعلّم

  • Represent a relation on a finite set as a set of ordered pairs, a table and an arrow diagram.
  • Test a relation for reflexivity, symmetry and transitivity, giving a counterexample whenever a property fails.
  • Pass between an equivalence relation and the partition formed by its equivalence classes.

تعريف

  • A relation R on a set A is a subset of A × A; we write a R b when (a, b) ∈ R.
  • R is an equivalence relation if it is reflexive (a R a), symmetric (a R b implies b R a) and transitive (a R b and b R c imply a R c).
  • The equivalence class of a is [a] = {x ∈ A : x R a}.
  • A partition of A is a set of non-empty, pairwise disjoint subsets of A whose union is A.

مبرهنة

  • The equivalence classes of an equivalence relation on A form a partition of A, and every partition of A comes from exactly one equivalence relation.
  • Any two equivalence classes are either equal or disjoint.
  • For n ≥ 1, 'has the same remainder on division by n' is an equivalence relation on ℤ with exactly n classes.

مفاهيم خاطئة شائعة

  • Thinking symmetry and transitivity together imply reflexivity; the argument fails for an element related to nothing.
  • Treating an equivalence class as a single element instead of a set of elements.
  • Assuming every relation is symmetric, as 'is less than' shows it need not be.

يقود إلى

اكتشافات اختيارية

مسارات التعلّم

قراءات إضافية

  • Daniel J. Velleman, How to Prove It: A Structured Approach (1994)