Ordinals and cardinals
Warm-upHumanWhich of these ordinals are equal to ? Select all.
Which of these ordinals are equal to ? Select all.
Write in the form with a natural number. What is ?
Write in the form with a natural number. What is ?
In the proof that a strictly increasing on a well-order satisfies , we take the least with . Why does this lead to a contradiction?
Which of these statements are provable in ZF, without the axiom of choice? Select all.
What is the cardinality of ?
Which Lean statement correctly formalises Cantor's theorem for a type α?
Here is a faulty argument. “(1) The map together with is a bijection from to . (2) So and have the same cardinality. (3) So and are isomorphic well-orders. (4) Hence by uniqueness of order types.” Which step is wrong?
Represent an ordinal below by its list of coefficients, lowest power first: [c0, c1, ..., ck] stands for (so [3, 0, 2] is , and [] is ), with no trailing zeros. Write ord_add(a, b) computing the ordinal sum . Rule: the terms of below the leading power of are absorbed, the coefficients at the leading power of add up, and the higher terms of remain.