Kan extensions
Warm-upHumanLet and be posets, a complete lattice, monotone and monotone, all viewed as thin categories and functors. Which formula gives the pointwise left Kan extension ?
Let and be posets, a complete lattice, monotone and monotone, all viewed as thin categories and functors. Which formula gives the pointwise left Kan extension ?
Let be the functor from the discrete category with two objects to the terminal category, and let have and . How many elements does have?
Let be a subgroup of index in a finite group , let be the inclusion of one-object categories, and let be an -set (a functor ) with . How many elements does the right Kan extension have?
In the proof that the pointwise formula gives a left Kan extension, given and , we define by . For this to make sense, the maps must form a cocone over : for we need . Which fact gives this?
Which situation gives a functor with no left Kan extension along ?
Which of these are Kan extensions? (Choose all that apply.)
Suppose with , unit and counit . Which statement is correct?
In the lesson's Lean file, lan k f d = ⨆ (c : C) (_ : k c ≤ d), f c. Which Lean statement says that is left adjoint to restriction along (for monotone , on monotone maps into a complete lattice )?
Let be a finite set of sample points in , the inclusion and any function, given as a dictionary {point: value}. Write lan_value(f, d) returning (use float('-inf') for an empty supremum) and ran_value(f, d) returning (float('inf') if empty). Then check: when is not monotone, is its running maximum, the smallest monotone function above on the sample points.