Saltar al contenido
The Lumenary
Sendero del AsombroOpcional · nunca se calificaParte de Sets

How many infinities?

Esta página todavía no está disponible en Español, por eso se muestra en English.

Ayuda a traducir →
1

La pregunta

There are infinitely many counting numbers and infinitely many infinite 0–1 sequences. Are these two infinities the same size?

Prueba el experimento antes de seguir leyendo. No hay una forma equivocada de explorar.

2

Experimento

La máquina diagonal

Esta es una lista de sucesiones infinitas de ceros y unos (solo podemos mostrar el principio). La sucesión dorada d invierte la diagonal.

s1…
s2…
s3…
s4…
s5…
s6…
d101001????…

Señala una fila (o llega a ella con el tabulador) para ver dónde se diferencia d de ella. Haz clic en cualquier dígito para cambiar la lista.

Añade d a la lista y aparecerá una nueva d que vuelve a ser distinta. Ninguna lista, por larga que sea, puede contener todas las sucesiones.

3

Pistas, si las quieres

    4

    Qué está pasando

    Qué está pasando

    Two sets have the same size — the same cardinality — when their elements can be paired off one-to-one, by a bijection. For finite sets this is just counting. For infinite sets it gives surprises: the even numbers 0,2,4,…0, 2, 4, \dots can be paired with all counting numbers 0,1,2,…0, 1, 2, \dots by n↦2nn \mapsto 2n, so there are "as many" even numbers as counting numbers. A set that can be listed as s1,s2,s3,…s_1, s_2, s_3, \dots is called countable.

    Are all infinite sets countable? In 1891 Georg Cantor gave a famous argument that the answer is no.

    Suppose someone hands us a list s1,s2,s3,…s_1, s_2, s_3, \dots of infinite 0–1 sequences. Build a new sequence dd by flipping the diagonal: let the nn-th digit of dd be the opposite of the nn-th digit of sns_n. Then dd differs from s1s_1 in position 11, from s2s_2 in position 22, and in general from sns_n in position nn. So dd is not anywhere on the list.

    Since every list misses some sequence, the set of all infinite 0–1 sequences is uncountable: it is a strictly bigger infinity than the counting numbers.

    Nota

    The experiment shows the mechanism on a finite part of a list. It illustrates the idea; the argument above — which works for any list whatsoever — is the proof.

    The same diagonal idea reappears across mathematics and computer science: in showing that the real numbers are uncountable, in Gödel's incompleteness theorems, and in Turing's proof that no program can decide whether every program halts.

    Probado computacionalmenteRedactado con IA · pendiente de revisión humana
    5

    Adónde lleva esto